Archive for October, 2008

Dodge Ram Challenge: Reality Gets Tough

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

2009-dodge-ram.jpgBrand: Dodge (Chrysler, LLC)
Execution: TV, Online Webisodes, Viral
Target: Pickup truck buyers
Rating: ****
Reviewer: David Vinjamuri

Description:
A multi-part webisode series produced by BBDO and directed by Tony Scott (director of Top Gun and brother of Ridley Scott).  The Dodge Ram Challenge is essentially a reality show where four two-person teams compete in a series of four races in new Dodge Ram pickups.  The teams are each composed of men from a single profession: contractors, cowboys, firemen and military.  The races involve extreme challenges of the sort often seen on television advertising – except that they are navigated in stock Dodge Rams with real people driving.  The campaign is viewable by webisodes but Chrysler is using significant advertising to drive traffic, including a major presence on NFL football.

What Works:
Brands can create and distribute interesting content without tv networks when they spend the time and money to get top talent.  Brand-based reality television has been done before (Brawny Academy by Fallon, for one), but Tony Scott and BBDO take it to another level with the Dodge Ram Challenge.  Scott understands that small touches create the atmosphere for real drama and he adds the sleek black military-style chase helicopters, pump-action shotgun as a starter pistol and a variety of scary-looking challenges to this series.  As with any webisode, only a fraction of the Ram purchase demographic will ever view the series.  But Dodge realizes that brand recognition is not really the game here: they are looking to convince people already contemplating a purchase to take the next step, which is no small task during a recession.  The Dodge Ram Challenge also helps the brand build authenticity against its key rival – the new Ford F150.

What Doesn’t:
You really have to enjoy reality television to appreciate this series.  Dodge also took the risk that they’d be filming on of their vehicle drop an axle or be demolished altogether.  While they might have elected not to show this footage, news of its existence would certainly have leaked. So this was a high-stakes gamble in more ways than one.

Branding Bottom Line:
Dodge boosts our testosterone just as the economy drains our wallet.

Opportunistic Marketing from Planned Parenthood

Friday, October 10th, 2008

sarah_palin.jpgBrand: Planned Parenthood
Execution: E-mail/Viral
Target: Pro-Choice Voters
Rating: ****
Reviewer: David Vinjamuri

Description:
An e-mail campaign urging people to support Planned Parenthood with a small donation, but with a twist.  The e-mail reads as follows:

Hi allI don’t know how you feel about Planned Parenthood, but this is a great idea.  I just did it myself, and feel fantastic about it.  Simple, fast & cheap.  And toward a great cause.  Pass it along…Instead of (in addition to?) us all sending around emails about how horrible she is, let’s all make a donation to Planned Parenthood. In Sarah Palin’s name. And here’s the good part: when you make a donation to PP in her name, they’ll send her a card telling her that the donation has been made in her honor. Here’s the link to the Planned Parenthood website:https://secure.ga0.org/02/pp10000_inhonor

You’ll need to fill in the address to let PP know where to send the “in Sarah Palin’s honor” card. I suggest you use the address for the McCain campaign headquarters, which is:

McCain for President
1235 S. Clark Street
1st Floor
Arlington , VA 22202

PS make sure you use that link above or choose the pulldown of Donate–Honorary or Memorial Donations, not the regular “Donate Online”

What Works:
This advertising blog has been told that the concept for this campaign originated not from an agency but from a staffer within Planned Parenthood.  The result of this campaign was two-fold:  first, it generated $1 million in donations for Planned Parenthood.  Secondly, it got good media coverage and generated positive publicity for Planned Parenthood.  Half of the donors were not on Planned Parenthood’s active e-mail list, so there was a strong viral component to the campaign.We like three things about this campaign:

  1. Opportunistic – This campaign takes advantage of the popular media attention for Vice Presidential Candidate Governor Sarah Palin and her pro-life stance by giving pro-choice advocates a simple way to send a message – literally.
  2. Simple – No separate infrastructure was created to support this campaign.  Donors were sent to Planned Parenthood’s existing donation site.
  3. Clever – Making the donation in honor of Gov. Palin and sending the messages to the McCain-Palin campaign headquarters created a media story and made the e-mail compelling.

What Doesn’t:
There is a fine art to informal e-mail campaigns like this.  If the campaign feels inauthentic or forced, it will fail.  If it feels fake or contrived, it may even get negative blog coverage.  This campaign walks a line.  It doesn’t represent itself as originating from Planned Parenthood (we have been told that it originated from a Planned Parenthood staffer), which carries some risk.

Branding Bottom Line:
Planned Parenthood finds some use for Sarah Palin after all.

ADDENDUM:

This from Planned Parenthood -

Hi David-

Just read your blog post about the viral email campaign concering Planned Parenthood and Sarah Palin.

I wanted to clarify something- the viral email did not originate with Planned Parenthood, and the origins of the email remain unknown. Also, 2/3 of the donors are first time donors to PP.

two and a half weeks ago, we had many media inquires about the viral email, so we issued a press release on it:

http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/302.htm

It is inaccurate to characterize the email as originating from Planned Parenthood.  

Thanks.

***
Tait Sye
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
www.plannedparenthood.org
Planned Parenthood Action Fund
www.plannedparenthoodaction.org

This advertising blog apologizes if our unnamed informant was incorrect about the source of the e-mail.  Our coverage is not a political endorsement.