Archive for the 'news' Category

Orville Redenbacher: ConAgra Meets Pet Cemetery

Friday, January 19th, 2007

orville-redenbacher.jpgBrand: Orville Redenbacher Gourmet Popping Corn (ConAgra Foods)
Execution: TV, Website
Target: Morbid Movie Lovers
Rating: *
Reviewer: David Vinjamuri

Description:
Orville Redenbacher, iconic American businessman and inventor of gourmet popping corn who died in 1995 has been resurrected by Omaha-based ConAgra Foods and Crispin, Porter & Bogusky in a new campaign for the popcorn brand which is owned by ConAgra.  In the first spot, Redenbacher marvels at how light MP3 players have become, then transitions into his product benefit (Orville Redenbacher’s popcorn pops up lighter and fluffier than ‘ordinary popcorn’). CGI graphics apparently render the movements of Redenbacher’s mouth as well as his post-mortem appearance in the commercial.

What Works:
If ConAgra (or more likely Crispin, Porter) was looking to draw some attention, then they will certainly get it with this jarring spot.  Anyone remembering Redenbacher from the commercials of the 70’s through early 90’s will have a strong opinion about this campaign.  We suspect that the recall of this spot will be extremely high.

Younger audiences may not be familiar with Redenbacher and might not understand the implication of his appearance.  The selling proposition of this spot is still relevant and might work if the central issue of Redenbacher’s appearance after his death is overlooked.

What Doesn’t:
This advertising blog witnessed a lively debate over the Gap/Audrey Hepburn spot (see our commentary here).  While the ad was well-executed, creative and cast an interesting light on Hepburn and Gap, many felt that it was morbid and inappropriate to resurrect Hepburn to peddle a product she never used in her life.

This appearance by Orville Redenbacher is ethically simpler, but much more distasteful in execution.  Redenbacher is resurrected to tout his life’s work, the product he loved with virtually the same words he used in the 70’s and 80’s.  Crispin, Porter and ConAgra, however, seem intent on pushing the viewer to acknowledge Redenbacher’s demise and resurrection by having him comment on MP3 players - an innovation that wasn’t around while he was.  This is what makes the spot feel so jarring and disconcerting.  CGI animation which makes it clear that Redenbacher’s lower jaw has been resynched to his new words like a marionette reinforces the chilling effect of this spot.

The problem with this spot is really that it is more provocation than sales pitch.  Crispin, Porter shoves our nose in the superhuman power of corporations to revive the dead for their own ends.  The crudeness of this effect makes it feel like subversive social commentary, striving for the exact effect it produces.

We doubt it will sell much popcorn.

Branding Bottom Line:
Redenbacher makes us think about death every time we eat popcorn.  Thanks, ConAgra.

NEWS: ThirdWay Advertising Blog Welcomes Bob Bader

Thursday, January 11th, 2007

Starting this week, our client-side advertising review staff has added a new voice.  Bob Bader is Group Director responsible for strategy development and marketing intelligence at Coca-Cola.  Bob wrote our review of Geico’s Caveman advertising this week and will soon be reviewing the Chase Freedom campaign.

Of course, Bob will not be writing about Coca-Cola or its competitors.  The rest of us won’t stop reviewing Coca-Cola or be any easier on Coke when we review their new campaigns.

Please join us in welcoming Bob to the ThirdWay Advertising Blog.

Who Needs a Bahamavention?

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006
bahamaslogo.jpgBrand: Bahamas (Bahamas Ministry of Tourism)
Execution: TV, Print, Infomercial, Website
Link: Spot 1, 2, 3, 4
Target
: Over-stressed North Americans
Rating
: ****
Reviewer
: David

Description:
This campaign’s centerpiece is four spots, each of which document ‘Bahamaventions’ - interventions by the family and friends of the overstressed. A vacation to the Bahamas is the therapeutic answer to each of these situations. The four protagonists are Lyle - an overloud executive, Monte - a grim-faced family man, Malcolm - a skinny, pasty white guy and Maureen - a tightly wound wife.

What Works:
The best feature of this new campaign is that it focuses not on the “Where?” of travel or the “How?” but the “Why?” Instead of just seeing pristine beaches (which all look the same in advertising), Fallon carefully lays out the argument for going on vacation in the first place. A pasty complexion, high stress levels, the tendency to snap and a grim demeanor are all good signs of someone who needs a vacation. These spots work by methodically and comically laying out the ‘before’ using living caricatures of these symptoms. Then we get the solution - a Bahamas vacation. The end benefit is the relief of the symptoms we’ve seen at the front end of the spot. There is a social rationale behind this as well as Americans on average fail to use 4 vacation days a year (up from three) and increasingly identify ‘life balance’ as a key missing element in the modern workplace.

The second element in this campaign is the use of humor to engage the audience. This advertising blog is often critical of humorous campaigns because they distract from the brand or overwhelm the value proposition of the advertising. Here, though, the humor is nicely tuned to make the point that vacation is a necessity rather than a luxury.

Finally, the ‘hook’ to this commercial from the branding standpoint is the ‘Bahamavention.’ This is memorable and intuitive. It makes the campaign ownable. The ‘reason why’ points (700+ islands, multiple types of vacations) work better because it is not difficult to tie the advertising back to the brand because of this coined term.We cannot predict whether, as Fallon Creative Director Todd Riddle hopes, ‘Bahamavention’ will make it into the cultural vocabulary the way other Fallon campaigns have (most memorably the “I’m not a doctor but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night” line). But either way we believe this campaign will help the Bahamas and prove to be a landmark for other destinations looking to build brand identities.

What Doesn’t:
This campaign attempts to own a generic end benefit. It is a risky undertaking. We understand that stress and depression are rampant, but is the Bahamas the only cure? Or even the first cure we’ll remember? It all depends on the viral strength of the Bahamavention concept. If the concept doesn’t take - meaning we never hear Jay Leno or David Letterman crack a joke about a politician needing a Bahamavention - then Fallon should seek to narrow the brand positioning. They can instead say that Bahamavention may not be the only cure for stress but it is a unique cure, and then explain why. This campaign also depends upon the carefully managed execution of humorous creative which can sometimes create problems down the line.

Branding Bottom Line:
We think Michael Richards needs a Bahamavention.

Kraft Revives Scratch ‘n Sniff

Tuesday, November 14th, 2006

kraft-ads.gifBrand: Kraft
Execution: Print
Target: Women 25-54
Rating: ****
Reviewer: David

Description:
For the fourth year, Kraft is sponsoring a special holiday issue of People which is being sent to 1mm of People’s 2.3mm subscriber audience (the mid-life women).  The issue will feature ads for Philadelphia Cream Cheese, Chips Ahoy, Jell-O and cinnamon coffee which are embedded with ‘rub and sniff’ technology (the successor to ’scratch ‘n sniff’) allowing consumers to smell the aroma of fresh cheesecake or coffee.  The new technology apparently prevents the premature release of the scent during the delivery process.  For more see Brian Steinberg’s article in the Wall Street Journal here.

What Works:
In his well-regarded book Brand Sense, Martin Lindstrom reminds us that most marketing activates only two of the five senses - sight and hearing.  Smart marketers with tangible products can use touch, taste and smell to add to the brand experience.  Mercedes, for instance, has patented its ‘new car smell’ which is added to each new Mercedes after production.  Scientists also know that smell is the sense most closely linked to memory, so it makes sense that brands ought to use smell as a marketing tool.  This is woefully difficult with packaged goods products whose scents must often remain hidden through the purchase experience only to emerge in the home.

Kraft has overcome this problem by turning back to a modern update of an old tactic - the scent-impregnated print ad.  In this modern incarnation, the scent is imbued on a portion of the page which can be rubbed to bring it forth.   The scent is also apparently more lifelike and less irritating than older versions - although we have not yet seen this execution in person.

We applaud Kraft for its forward-thinking approach to marketing.  Rub and sniff may be no more than a novelty at the moment, but it has the potential to enrich the advertising experience.  This advertising blog appreciates marketers who find innovative ideas in the past as well as in the future.

What Doesn’t:
It all comes down to execution, and technologies like ‘rub ‘n sniff’ are tricky.  If the odors of the food fail to remind us of home-baked alternatives, the energy spent behind this campaign will have been entirely waisted.

Branding Bottom Line:
Kraft has us nostalgic for hula-hoops and 8 track tapes.

Nissan Sentra Gets its YouTube On

Friday, November 3rd, 2006

new_sentra_frprt.jpgBrand: Nissan Sentra (Nissan)
Execution: TV, Blog
Target: Young Drivers
Rating: *****
Reviewer: David

Description:
Nissan creates a new TV campaign for the Sentra featuring San Francisco native and photographer’s assistant Mark Horowitz living in his Sentra for a week. The seven spots are each entitled “A short film by Marc Horowitz”. Each is narrated by Mr. Horowitz and features his different experiences during the week. Horowitz adopted the following rules for his Sentra challenge:

I also set a bunch of rules for myself so the project is a little more challenging and has some boundaries. Here they are:

  1. I must live 7 straight days out of my Sentra. I am free to come and go from the Sentra as I please.
  2. I must not return to my apartment at any point during the 7 days.
  3. I must assume my normal day-to-day responsibilities including work and all scheduled client meetings.
  4. I must personally prepare at least 4 meals within the immediate vicinity of my Sentra.
  5. I must go on at least one date. Hopefully more.
  6. I must not let anyone else drive my car for the 7 days.
  7. I must sleep in a different location each night. Once the location is chosen I must not move from it.
  8. I must not set foot outside of my car for any reason from 12am to 5am.
  9. I must host at least 2 social functions in my Sentra. One must be on or after Day 6.
  10. I must maintain the highest standards of personal hygiene.

The spots bias towards comedy with Marc Horowitz showering in a sprinkler, cooking in a parking lot, going on a date with a girl who asks “Do you live in here?” and setting up an amateur autocross.

What Works:
We were most interested in this series of spots because it appears to have sprung from ethnographic research by Nissan. Adweek reports that the genesis of the campaign was a study of photos of Sentra owners which revealed that many of them were using the cars as rolling closets, carrying sports equipment, gym clothes and food among other things. That insight combined with the explosion of user-generated video on sites like YouTube and MySpace persuaded Jan Thompson, Nissan VP of Marketing to challenge Marc Horowitz to live in a new Sentra for a week and report back about it.

The spots are well executed and walk the tricky line between documentary filmmaking and advertising reasonably well. There is no pretense that the challenge and the spots are intended to do anything other than promote the Nissan Sentra, which helps. The spots are funny and engaging, which helps even more.

Most importantly, though, Nissan has reconceived the ‘product-as-hero’ form of advertising in a fresh new format. Instead of talking about the Sentra’s roominess or describing its bluetooth hands-free dialing, we see Marc Horowitz sleeping in the car and ordering pizza. This strikes us as a much more sensible way of showing the ‘permission to believe’ for the brand proposition than stating claims like “most interior volume in its class’ outright. The conventional approach always sounds to us like a comedian getting up in front of an audience and saying, “I’m really funny - ask my friends.”

The brand positioning here is around the user. Instead of trying to find someone to showcase a user demographic, Marc Horowitz personifies the psychographic profile of the user Nissan wants to embody for the Sentra. And it works. It is very difficult imagining Honda or Toyota following this route with the Civic or the Corolla.

What Doesn’t:
Six agencies including Omnicom Group’s TBWA\C\D, OMD, Tequila, The Vidal Partnership, Edelman and The Designory were involved in this campaign. Given that and the slick production values, effects and professional editing of this spot make us uncomfortable with the tag, “A film by Marc Horowitz.” We do not know what part of the creative and editorial process Marc Horowitz assumed but unless he was the actual director (which is somewhat harder to imagine with the collection of high-priced talent that must have been surrounding him), then this campaign is not a series of independent films by Marc Horowitz. This damages the authenticity of what is otherwise an excellent effort.

We also think the blog is a bit bare for the musings of someone who had a full week to spend in his car (presumably with some of the time spent by WiFi hotspots.) This also raises the spectre of outside authorship, as does the involvement of PR giant Edelman which has been recently outed as the backer of a pro-Wal-Mart blog.

We raise these issues because we feel that when large brands venture into user-created content, transparency is absolutely critical. This advertising blog does not feel that collaboration between an individual and advertising agencies is necessarily bad. But to properly evaluate the product, consumers must understand how much of the work is the individuals and how much is the brands. Numerous relevant questions are left unanswered by this campaign including how Marc Horowitz was chosen, whether he has created independent films before and who exactly was filming him. While these questions would never be answered in the TV spots, we would expect to read more in the blog.

Branding Bottom Line:
Nissan gives us My Life, My Car with a little too much new car smell.

Kibbles ‘n Bits Doggy Breath

Friday, October 20th, 2006

kibbles-n-bits-brushing-bites.gifBrand: Kibbles ‘n Bits (Del Monte)
Execution: TV
Link: Click Here
Target: Families with Dogs
Rating: ****
Reviewer: David

Description:
A German Shepherd stands in a bathroom, front paws up on the sink, looking into a mirror and gargling as a human would.  A pre-teen girl in pajamas approaches the bathroom door suspiciously.  We see the dog again, gargling and rinsing.  The girl opens the bathroom door.  “Duke?” she says incredulously.  The dog makes a Scooby Doo-like ‘hmmm?’ sound and turns its head towards her.  The spot cuts to a product shot of Kibbles ‘n Bits Brushing Bites and a voiceover says,    “There’s a better way to get rid of dog breath.  Introducing Kibbles ‘n Bits brushing bites.  It’s the only dog food with these special bits that cleans his teeth and freshens his breath.  New Kibbles ‘ n Bits Brushing Bites. More taste, more joy.”  The spot ends with the tagline “Kibbles ‘n Bits, Kibbles ‘n Bits,” as a dog pushes a bowl around with his nose, then licks the camera.

What Works:
This spot is an interesting rebuttal of the maxim, “traditional advertising is dead.”  It uses time tested (some would say time-worn) methods to produce a memorable, likeable spot.  In fact, IAG research rated this commercial as September 2006’s most-liked ad, with a favorability index of 156.

What works here?  The ad starts out with a simple attention-getter - a dog doing something that a human would normally do.  The old trick here is using animal actors, but it is somewhat more forgiveable for a pet food brand.  By anthropomorphizing the dog, Del Monte plays to one of our oldest curiosities: what sets us apart from our pets.

Next, there is a clear exposition of the problem the brand will solve (this is a simple problem-solution spot).  Dogs have bad breath and all pet owners know this.  Then we get both a solution and a very good product shot with the introduction of Kibbles ‘n Bits Brushing Bites.  There is also an end benefit shot of Duke licking the girl’s face later in the spot.  The tagline at the end is meant to reinforce the brand.

What Doesn’t:
This spot was the most-liked ad of September 2007 but it was not on the list of most-recalled commercials.  This points to the problem with using cute things like children and animals in advertising.  They tend to overwhelm the commercial message in our memory.  This advertising blog believes this spot works, but Kibbles ‘n Bits needs to try harder to create a unique hook between the cute animal, product benefit and the brand.

Connecting to this issue of recall is brand positioning that is category generic.  Kibble ‘n Bits may be introducing a new product, but ‘fresher breath’ is not an ownable benefit.  Del Monte is leaving the brand vulnerable to competitive poaching by promoting this valuable but generic benefit without creating distinctive user imagery or a stronger proprietary advantage.

Branding Bottom Line:
Can we put those Brushing Bites into breakfast cereal?

COMMENTARY: Target Stores Misses the Mark on Movies

Monday, October 9th, 2006

Issue: Target Warns Studios not to give movie downloads a price advantage
Commentary by: David

This advertising blog has been a big fan of most of the advertising and brand positioning work from Target Stores over the past two years. The Minneapolis retailer has great marketing instincts and a keen sense of how to bring moderately priced home products with a sense of style and expert design to U.S. consumers (along with the industrial-sized packs of Bounty and multi-gallon jugs of detergent that we expect from a mass merchandiser).

Today the Wall Street Journal reported that target had warned movie studios about discounting to online players. The ’sharply worded letter from Target President Gregg Steinhafel’ said that Target had heard that some studios were planning to make new-release movies available to online services for less than they were selling the DVD versions to target.

This revelation comes on the heels of similar warnings to studios from Wal-Mart.

We thought Target knew better, however.

A great brand always acts in the best interests of its consumers, even if that means sending them elsewhere for some things. Why? Because the brand relationship is based on trust, and once that trust is violated it is incredibly difficult to regain. Target President Gregg Steinhafel was thinking about the topline when he wrote this letter. He was concerned about losing revenue as consumers begin to migrate from direct DVD sales to online purchase. He should have been thinking about the bottom line, instead. The bottom line is the strong margins and same-store revenue growth that Target enjoys because consumers trust that Target is looking out for their best interest.

It is absurd to think that movies downloaded online should cost either retailers or consumers the same as DVDs. Why? Not only is the product cost lower (with no DVD and no jewel case or DVD box surrounding the DVD) but movies downloaded over the Internet don’t come with all of the extras that DVDs do. In addition the quality is currently below DVD quality, the files are enormous and the download times very slow.

What online video downloads need now is lower prices and patient consumers as the technology evolves. They don’t pose a short-term threat to retailers because few people have either bandwidth or the disk space to keep a library of films on a hard drive. And until the films are available at DVD quality (or HD quality), this format will have limited appeal to videophiles.

All of which means that Target, Wal-Mart and others have plenty of time to prepare for the inevitable. For between video-on-demand and downloadable movies it is certain that the physical sale of DVDs will not be a longterm business for any mass merchandiser.

Target has many more important things to offer consumers. One thing is its unique vision of the future of the American household, designed by folks like Robert Graves. Another is trust. Mr. Steinhafel’s ill-advised strongarm tactics will take their place with the HP investigation of board members on the list of things that high-ranking corporate executives who should have known better did to hurt their brands this year.

HeadOn: Is the Most Annoying Spot on TV Effective?

Tuesday, August 1st, 2006

HeadOn.jpgBrand: HeadOn (Miralus Healthcare)
Execution: TV (Cable)
Link: Click Here
Target: Headache-prone Adults
Rating: ***
Reviewer: David

Description:
This simple 10-second spot has a single setup of a woman rubbing a stick of HeadOn. The voiceover says, “HeadOn, apply directly to the forehead. HeadOn, apply directly to the forehead. HeadOn, apply directly to the forehead.” The ad features an arrow showing where the forehead is and “apply directly to the forehead.” For the record, HeadOn is a homeopathic headache remedy, about which Wikipedia states “Chemical analysis has shown that the product consists of almost entirely wax. The two listed active ingredients: white bryony (a type of vine) and potassium dichromate are diluted to .000001 PPM and 1 PPM respectively.[2] At these levels it is unlikely that they have any effect. ”

What Works:
HeadOn is the little spot that roared, gaining unabashed admiration from luminaries like Slate’s Seth Stevenson (who awarded it an A+) and apparently boosting the sales of tiny Miralus Healthcare with its efficient :10 second buys primarily on cable.

The HeadOn ad runs directly against prevailing wisdom that suggests ads must entertain. Instead it simply reinforces the sole positioning point - how the product is used. There is not even a mention of what the product does (likely to avoid FDA or FCC issues with unsubstantiated claims although the product is presumably covered by permissive DSHEA regulations).

What works in the spot is also what annoys - the repetition. Taking a simple line and repeating it thrice gains attention and does break through the clutter. This would not work if very many advertisers were using the same tactic, but HeadOn stands alone at the moment. And as Stevenson notes, the repetition is also likely to give you the type of headache the product is meant to relieve, thus creating its own deman.

What Doesn’t:
From the perspective of this advertising blog, HeadOn demonstrates a problem in advertising that is well-studied in economics. This is the so-called problem of the commons. Problems of the commons are those whose solution never benefits an individual citizen in the short-term but  which nevertheless must be solved to benefit society. Thus littering and polluting almost always serves the immediate needs of the individual or company who litters or pollutes but preventing littering or pollution is critical for the community in the longterm. Similarly funding for long-term projects like new schools (which will only benefit future parents) or infrastructure projects like roads or rails may not benefit any single person in the short term but are critical for everyone in the longterm.

The commons question represented by HeadOn is the viewing experience for the TV viewer. HeadOn is undoubtedly an effective spot for Miralus Healthcare. It is unusual, inexpensive and arresting. But it also is so annoying that it causes some viewers to change the channel and degrades the viewing experience for others. Absent Nielsen ratings for commercials which we eagerly anticipate next year it is very difficult to quantify the cost of this effect. But the general problem is well-known on radio, where some commercials can be so annoying that their constant repetition causes listeners to tune out.

We would probably not address this issue if the HeadOn commercial were not symptomatic of a larger problem in TV and Print as well as on Radio. The general desperation for advertising revenue has led networks and media properties who should know better to accept dangerous, shoddy and deceptive advertising - as well as spots like this which are merely annoying. Watching CNN another news network after 11pm is like taking a stroll through the arcade at a State Fair - all sorts of strange things manifest themselves. Similarly, many respectable magazines run ads for unbelievable or illegal products in the back pages.

This practice helps nobody. As the availability of programming on the web and through other delivery channels increases, consumers will vote with their eyes against programs that annoy them and those that accept irresponsible advertising. Networks and publishers need to clean up their acts now while there is still time.

Branding Bottom Line:
HeadOn gets our attention by banging us on the head. Which we apparently deserve.

Genpets Knocking at Our Door

Thursday, June 22nd, 2006

Genpet_feature.jpgBrand: Genpets (Adam Brandejs)
Execution: Viral, Website, In-Store
Link: click here
Target: Web design firms, ad agencies
Rating: *****
Reviewer: David

Description:
A viral campaign winding its way slowly through the Internet and the Blogsphere and which recently garnered a straight-faced writeup from Tim Nudd at AdFreak (the blog of respected industry publication Adweek). The website looks like slick product/feature/benefit work of any consumer product company except that the product is a genetically engineered pet, a Genpet. The Genpet can be peg-mounted in its plastic, tamper-proof packaging and comes with a heart monitor:

Imagine walking into a department store or any big box store, and while browsing an aisle you find a display where packages hang; which, at first glance, seem to contain large action figures. Upon closer inspection, you realize they are actually bizarre, altered, bipedal mammals sealed in a plastic bubble where they uneasily rest in some kind of induced hibernation.
A series of glowing and beeping heart monitors on the packages gives a hint that they are alive. The rising and falling of their chests as well as their occasional twitching, shaking and clawing, albeit limited by the tie-wraps, which keep them in place, confirms the life of these creatures. They are there, ready to take home and add to your life as the next entertainment gadget; bioengineered creatures, mass-produced, and pre-packaged for your convenience.

The Genpet line (which is made of steel, plastic and microchips but looks eerily real) has actually been placed in a store in Toronto, where it generated the expected reaction:

While in the store window of Iodine Toronto, the shop owner began sleeping in the store as many nights, people would bang at the windows furiously. Some in protest of the small Bio-genetically engineered creatures trapped in plastic, some wanting to wake them up or buy them. Hordes of teens wanting a bioengineered pet met confused, baffled, or even shocked looks from parents.

The purpose for the project appears to be a mixture of commercial art, social commentary and job-seeking by Mr. Brandejs.
Genpets years.jpg

What Works:
We chose to review this unorthodox campaign because it is an excellent example of a viral campaign with enough intrigue and drama to create a real groundswell on the blogosphere and we are early enough in this process for our readers to watch this unfold in real time. Even though Genpets was not created to sell a conventional product, the execution by Mr. Brandejs provides a great example for brands seeking to create a big splash on the web. Before we found the backstory behind this campaign, this advertising blog first imagined that this was a viral campaign for an upcoming movie. In fact the Genpets remind us of some of the creatures created for the film The Fifh Element and clearly borrow from the pet-cloning premise of the Arnold Scharzenegger film The 6th Day.

Here’s what works about Genpets as a viral campaign:

  1. Attention to detail: Brandejs got all the elements right when crafting this campaign. He created very realistic looking bioengineered pets and sweated the details on the packaging to make it look real and ordinary - a significant feat for an individual.
  2. Patience: Without a promotional budget, Mr. Brandejs was forced to do what all good marketers ought to when working on a viral campaign - go slow. By putting up a convincing website and getting placement in a single store in Toronto, Brandejs planted a seed which grew slowly but surely and has reached a variety of blogs and forums. A Google search for Genpets currently returns 59,000 results.
  3. Controversy: Genpets works because the premise is controversial and the execution makes it moreso. Putting the Genpets in ordinary plastic packaging like a G.I. Joe intentionally trivializes the issue of creating new life. The implication is that life is disposable. The execution shows us a clear and compelling version of a future we need to think about before it arrives. The tension created by this idea makes it shocking and fascinating.
  4. Relevance: This campaign attracts attention and draws controversy because it is highly relevant. One suspects that Mr. Brandejs is no bible-belt Christian conservative (and we confess that we do not know if Canada even has a bible belt) - so the political and social commentary here is even more acute. Timing is everything and this campaign benefits from excellent timing.

What Doesn’t:
Because Mr. Brandejs had seemingly vague PR goals for this campaign, he may be unprepared for the eventual result. We predict CNN coverage within a month and some significant controversy. But on his website, Mr. Brandejs seems to be looking for some exposure as an artist and possibly freelance web progamming gigs. He ought to think carefully about what he really wants because the offers he gets are likely to be in an entirely different league. The lesson for brands here is that it is critical to establish goals for a viral campaign, know what the follow-on will be and have a crisis management team in place in case the virus spreads in unwanted directions.

Executionally, the only misstep we noted in the campaign was the lack of a phone number and corporate headquarters address for Genpets.

Branding Bottom Line:
Creating Genpets to attract freelance jobs is a little like sculpting the Pieta to get into art school. Crispin Porter should hire this guy.

Dairy Queen’s Monster Spot

Tuesday, May 30th, 2006

blizzard.jpgBrand: Dairy Queen Monster Cookie Blizzard (Dairy Queen)
Execution: TV
Link: Click Here (It is the second to last spot)
Target: Grown Kids
Rating: ****
Reviewer: David

Description:
A father and son sit side by side, eating Monster Cookie Blizzards at Dairy Queen. The Dad asks, “Are you enjoying your monster cookie blizzard?” and the son grunts enthusiastically. “But Dad, where do monster cookies come from?” the boy asks. “Ah - well,” the Dad says, at a loss for words. The spot cuts to a monster cookie factor where monsters are pounding out and baking the cookies. As the monsters start to talk, we realize that they have feelings and, apparently crushes too. One monster is making a special cookie with green M&Ms for the lovely, three-eyed Gertrude. The spot ends with a close product shot of the blizzard and the voiceover, “It’s scary good. The Monster Cookie Blizzard with M&Ms. New at Dairy Queen.” The last frame is the Dairy Queen logo with the tagline “Something Different.”

What Works:
This spot certainly is something different and displays great imagination and ingenuity. Although framed in the father-son context, it works as well appealing to the fatherly crowd as directly to the kids. In fact, some of the references to adolescent romantic hijinks might be easier to decode for adults than for children.

We chose this spot to review because it features some of the best and most convincing product photography we have seen. The ice cream looks rich and inviting and a close up on the spoon shows the appealingly moist bits of cookie. Young brand managers and assistant account execs could take this spot as a training video for how to produce great food photography.

What Doesn’t:
To the extent this spot is targeted at children younger than 12, we believe (as we have detailed before in our post ‘The Boomerang Effect: Advertising to Children‘) that it is a bad idea. However we also believe that these spots are very effective at reaching adults as well, and this spot delivers particularly well against the adult male audience.

The brand position ’scary good’ is not especially differentiated. While this spot will effectively sell the new Monster Cookie Blizzard as a destination treat for Dairy Queen, we are not sure that it will build the brand equity of the franchise.
Branding Bottom Line:
We will not be watching any more DQ spots before dinner time.