Citi Moves Blindly Ahead With “Citi - Very, Very, Very Rewarding”
Brand: Citi (Citigroup)
Execution: TV and Print
Link: Not Yet Available
Target: Citibank Customers
Rating: **
Reviewer: David
Description:
This is a new campaign called Citi - Very Rewarding.” Citi promotes its rewards program with Citi - Very Rewarding which features two eccentric East European-sounding characters, Roman and Victor showing the many ways they can earn Citi rewards points. In the six TV spots and three print executions, the pair show how easy it is to earn Citi rewards point by doing everything from basic banking to paying their Citimortgage to using the Citi Premier Pass Credit card. The spots are directed by Jared Hess, best known as the director of Napolean Dynamite and Nacho Libre.
What Works:
The brand strategy is obvious here - Citi wants to let everyone know that they can earn points for basic banking activities as easily as for using Citi Premier Pass credit cards. Given this strategy, Fallon has done a solid job of creating a quirky campaign that is interesting enough to grab our attention. They chose a hot director, Jared Hess and parodied a popular movie (Borat) to come up with a campaign that communicates and should have good recall.
What Doesn’t:
Citigroup has made a strategic error with this campaign. There is nothing wrong with letting people know that you’re introducing new features and benefits to one of your core consumer programs (Citi Rewards). By spending $100 million or more to do this, however, Citi is changing their brand positioning, and not for the better. With the previous Fallon campaign, “Live Richly”, Citi accomplished a minor miracle in banking brand positioning. They had managed to position their bank by defining their core user as someone who cared about more than money and Citi as the bank that enabled people to worry about living rather than money.
Fallon spokesperson Rosemary Abendroth tells us that Citi will indeed have a new branding campaign but that it will be “some time” until we see it. For the time being, the Citi brand will be moved forward with product promotion like the entertaining identity theft campaign and this new effort.
By displacing rather than supplementing the “Live Richly” campaign, however, Citibank is essentially swapping a branding campaign based on the type of user who might be attracted to Citibank (the consumer who understands that life is not just about money) for a “features and benefits” brand positioning. The “Live Richly” brand positioning was clear and defendable. By using television and huge spend levels, Citi is creating new brand positioning with these product spots whether they like it or not.
And like their consumers, Citibank will almost certainly see a quick reward for this behavior. Citibank will almost certainly impress its own consumers and competitive users with the richness of its rewards program which now rewards basic banking. This will undoubtedly boost quarterly profits and send chills down the spines of Wall Street analysts during this critical holiday season when people’s credit card purchasing soars.
Unfortunately, Citi is playing the brand positioning game like a novice chess player, not even looking a single move ahead. When Citi was the bank that understands that its not about money, no other bank could compete to own that position. With Citi now being the bank that offers the richest rewards for banking activity, any bank can compete. In fact to own Citi’s new brand positioning, all Bank of America or JP Morgan Chase would have to do would be to offer richer rewards. Does that sound like an arms race in the making to you?
Tactically we also feel that Citi made a mistake by using Fallon to execute this campaign. It’s a little like asking Matisse to paint your aluminum siding. Fallon’s creative horsepower will be far better used on a campaign that is truly strategic - the upcoming successor to the ‘live richly’ theme. Here they are wasted on this tactical effort which could have been better accomplished with a direct mail brochure.
Branding Bottom Line:
We eagerly await the next $100mm campaign from Citi announcing free toasters with direct deposit.

November 3rd, 2006 at 10:07 pm
who is the actor that plays “roman”?
NEED TO KNOW…i think it is my uncle and he won’t admit it.
Please help me win my bet
November 17th, 2006 at 8:35 pm
And what is the guy saying at the end?
November 17th, 2006 at 11:33 pm
The strategic error is in relying on these two bizarre, mysterious characters. Who are they? They have no backstory. I have no reason to identify with them. I have no reason to rely on their judgment. What the hell?!?
November 24th, 2006 at 12:08 pm
So who are Victor and Roman? I have been trying to convince a friend that Roman is Judd Hirsch … You have to admit there is a resemblence, don’t you think?!
http://tv.zap2it.com/photos/index/0,1237,zp_fromThumb%7C93344%7C98807,00.html
November 26th, 2006 at 10:57 pm
Everyone in my family is trying to find out the name of the actor playing Roman. He must be our father’s twin brother! Any one know who he is?
November 27th, 2006 at 8:01 am
Judd Hirsch was the first person I thought of - stiil do. I think he’s older than “Roman” looks, but makeup can do wonders.
November 30th, 2006 at 12:57 pm
The new Citi Bank commercials with Victor & Roman are just awful!
December 4th, 2006 at 7:36 am
Hi, can you tell me Romans real name? Thank you!
December 4th, 2006 at 3:38 pm
I’ve been trying to figure out who plays Roman, too. The wife thinks Judd Hirsch, but the age and face are a little off.
December 4th, 2006 at 7:59 pm
I think Roman is really of Eastern European decent; that accent is too good to be fake.
December 6th, 2006 at 4:12 pm
The main problem with this campaign is that it sucks: Its not funny, its not identifiable, it barely has a message. It sucks. Especially after the Live Richly campaign
December 8th, 2006 at 4:57 pm
As much as these ads annoy me and confirm my opinion that Jared Hess is the most overrated filmmaker since Brian DePalma, I prefer these “quirky” ads to the sleight-of-hand “Live Richly” campaign. Call me a cynic (hey, not all at once!), but it offended me a little bit that a multinational banking monolith was feeding me messages like “Nobody grew up wanting to be Moneyman.” Oh, really? Well, a lot of people DID become “Moneyman,” and sit on the Citi board of directors. If Citi wanted to convince us that money wasn’t everything, the best way to illustrate that would be to reduce or eliminate ATM fees and other service charges. Oops, sorry — I thought they meant money wasn’t everything to THEM. That message was only for us.
December 12th, 2006 at 8:32 am
the actor who plays roman in theciti bank commercials name is Roman Tokar
December 13th, 2006 at 11:33 pm
Roman is his real name. He is a doorman at an office building in NY. If you want to meet him go to 444 Park Ave South (main entrance).
December 26th, 2006 at 2:54 pm
Hi. I wrote in awhile ago to see if anyone knew if Roman’s accent is for REAL?? If not, he certainly fakes it as well as any actor I’ve ever heard!! appreciate a reply Thanks DK
April 9th, 2007 at 11:22 am
Hello,
Roman Tokar is one of my favorite actors.It’s a shame that
CitiBank pulled all the commercials.If it weren’t for Roman,
they wouldn’t be popular as they are now.If I had a company,
I would definatley have Roman Tokar as my spokesman,
Because I find him rewarding.Very,very,very Rewarding.
December 18th, 2007 at 12:42 pm
Free toasters with direct deposit? Is that meant to be a sarcastic joke? Or is it smt Citi is (was) considering?