<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Office - &#8220;Dinosaur&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html</link>
	<description>Straight Talk on Advertising from the Client Side</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: reply to anoymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html#comment-300</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html#comment-300</guid>
					<description>yes showing examples of microsoft office are really compelling. I could watch microsoft office demos all day. Microsofts marketers missed a huge opportunity by not running huge ads in the wall street journal with a list of product features... wait I changed my mind i will take the dinos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes showing examples of microsoft office are really compelling. I could watch microsoft office demos all day. Microsofts marketers missed a huge opportunity by not running huge ads in the wall street journal with a list of product features&#8230; wait I changed my mind i will take the dinos.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html#comment-5</guid>
					<description>I think the MS Dinosaur ads are awful.  First off, Microsoft doesn't provide the reader with any compelling reason to upgrade to a new version of Office.  If they actually showed an example of how to do something better in a new version that would be more compelling.  Powerpoint itself is a dinosaur of a program, or a "corpse of a program" as said by John C. Dvorak in PC Magazine recently.  Plus, Word still doesn't handle even numbered lists correctly.  I think tech-savvy readers look at the ads and say, "I'll upgrade when you give me a real reason to upgrade."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the MS Dinosaur ads are awful.  First off, Microsoft doesn&#8217;t provide the reader with any compelling reason to upgrade to a new version of Office.  If they actually showed an example of how to do something better in a new version that would be more compelling.  Powerpoint itself is a dinosaur of a program, or a &#8220;corpse of a program&#8221; as said by John C. Dvorak in PC Magazine recently.  Plus, Word still doesn&#8217;t handle even numbered lists correctly.  I think tech-savvy readers look at the ads and say, &#8220;I&#8217;ll upgrade when you give me a real reason to upgrade.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 02:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/microsoft/microsoft-office-dinosaur.html#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Well done! There's definitely a market space for ad critics like yourself. The ads you've reviewed are definitely relevant as I've seen most of them too, even though I don't read as much magazines or watch as much TV as most people. &lt;BR/&gt;- Kevin [http://theory.isthereason.com]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! There&#8217;s definitely a market space for ad critics like yourself. The ads you&#8217;ve reviewed are definitely relevant as I&#8217;ve seen most of them too, even though I don&#8217;t read as much magazines or watch as much TV as most people. <br />- Kevin [http://theory.isthereason.com]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
