<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COMMENTARY: Gillette Fusion Performs as Predicted</title>
	<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/commentary-gillette-fusion-performs-as-predicted.html</link>
	<description>Straight Talk on Advertising from the Client Side</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: CTW</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/commentary-gillette-fusion-performs-as-predicted.html#comment-114169</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/commentary-gillette-fusion-performs-as-predicted.html#comment-114169</guid>
					<description>Gillete is just screwing over men who absolutely need to shave everyday. Why do I say this? Gee...lets see, they created the Fusion razor and added a few more blades and an extra trimmer...and the result? A HORRIBLE SHAVE!!!

That's right the fusion sucks, I only use the Mach3...and it is still expensive. just recently Gillete switched the packaging from 4-packs to 5-packs and jacked up the price. The difference in the price was definetely not proportional to the "value" of that one blade. Gillete spends probably 50 cents on a 5 pack and $2 on marketing, and sells the product for $11. This is pathetic...and it definetely is a monopoly because Schick does not pose any competition to the far more advertised Gillette products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gillete is just screwing over men who absolutely need to shave everyday. Why do I say this? Gee&#8230;lets see, they created the Fusion razor and added a few more blades and an extra trimmer&#8230;and the result? A HORRIBLE SHAVE!!!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right the fusion sucks, I only use the Mach3&#8230;and it is still expensive. just recently Gillete switched the packaging from 4-packs to 5-packs and jacked up the price. The difference in the price was definetely not proportional to the &#8220;value&#8221; of that one blade. Gillete spends probably 50 cents on a 5 pack and $2 on marketing, and sells the product for $11. This is pathetic&#8230;and it definetely is a monopoly because Schick does not pose any competition to the far more advertised Gillette products.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Un blog sobre cómo llamar a las cosas &#124; Impresiones, el Blog de Javier Velilla</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/commentary-gillette-fusion-performs-as-predicted.html#comment-92877</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/commentary-gillette-fusion-performs-as-predicted.html#comment-92877</guid>
					<description>[...] 2. La palabra de moda: Fusion (o justamente lo contrario). Aseguran que hasta 63 marcas estadounidenses emplean la palabra ‘Fusion’, desde Flavia Fusion, Maxtor Fusion, Ford Fusion, Gillette Fusion (un interesante análisis aquí)&#8230; Este concepto de ‘dosenuno’ es ya un lugar común. Name Development critica el uso de este término: “in many cases, I don&#8217;t think Fusion communicates the benefit to the consumer, nor does the name reflect a unique and ownable brand strategy”. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2. La palabra de moda: Fusion (o justamente lo contrario). Aseguran que hasta 63 marcas estadounidenses emplean la palabra ‘Fusion’, desde Flavia Fusion, Maxtor Fusion, Ford Fusion, Gillette Fusion (un interesante análisis aquí)&#8230; Este concepto de ‘dosenuno’ es ya un lugar común. Name Development critica el uso de este término: “in many cases, I don&#8217;t think Fusion communicates the benefit to the consumer, nor does the name reflect a unique and ownable brand strategy”. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
