<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commentary: Why Tiger is bad for Accenture but still good for Nike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/why-tiger-woods-is-bad-for-accenture-but-still-good-for-nike.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/accenture/why-tiger-woods-is-bad-for-accenture-but-still-good-for-nike.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Beevers</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/accenture/why-tiger-woods-is-bad-for-accenture-but-still-good-for-nike.html#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Beevers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/why-tiger-woods-is-bad-for-accenture-but-still-good-for-nike.html#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>Accenture made the right decision to pull their ads that had Tiger Woods in them. As said above there are many celebrities that may expose a brand to negative attention. Tiger Woods is not the first or the last. I just feel that alot of these celebrities  should restrain themselves from things that will bring them to the eyes of the viewers in a negative way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accenture made the right decision to pull their ads that had Tiger Woods in them. As said above there are many celebrities that may expose a brand to negative attention. Tiger Woods is not the first or the last. I just feel that alot of these celebrities  should restrain themselves from things that will bring them to the eyes of the viewers in a negative way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/accenture/why-tiger-woods-is-bad-for-accenture-but-still-good-for-nike.html#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/commentary/why-tiger-woods-is-bad-for-accenture-but-still-good-for-nike.html#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Great post and completely agree with your assessment. One other issue with the Accenture ads is a technical one but still important.  The ads have a style that is easy to parody and open to double-entendre.  Nothing wrong with that until now but would have made it all the harder for Accenture to continue using Tiger going forwards. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and completely agree with your assessment. One other issue with the Accenture ads is a technical one but still important.  The ads have a style that is easy to parody and open to double-entendre.  Nothing wrong with that until now but would have made it all the harder for Accenture to continue using Tiger going forwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

