Microsoft “I’m a PC” Uses Political Campaign Tactics in Consumer Advertising
Brand: Microsoft
Execution: TV
Target: Mac-vulnerable PC Users
Rating: **
Reviewer: David Vinjamuri
Description:
Microsoft’s new Crispin Porter & Bogusky advertising continues with a new campaign intended to show the diversity of PC users. “I’m a PC and I’ve been made into a stereotype” is the opening line of the spot, delivered by a John Hodgman lookalike (Hodgman is the actor who plays the PC in the “I’m a Mac, I’m a PC” spots by Apple). The spot then progresses to showing a variety of people, from celebrities like Eva Longoria and Deepak Chopra to astronauts, scuba divers and ordinary people.
What Works:
This is a very interesting attempt to take a common political campaign tactic and bring it to the consumer arena. The tactic is the “Checkers” ad (from Nixon who once complained that the press was so vicious that they were attacking the gift of a cocker spaniel to his daughters) which complains that the opponent is running a dirty campaign and smearing the candidate. This type of ad is also a negative ad, of course, as it attempts to impugn the character of the opponent. Microsoft here is trying to turn the tables on Apple’s successful anti-PC campaign by showing that every type of person uses PCs and that the Apple ads are unfair.
This advertising is far more focused than the brief but expensive campaign that preceded it featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld. These spots also feel crisper with better pacing.
What Doesn’t:
What you almost never see in political campaigns is a candidate who has the support of 90% of voters attacking a challenger with 10% support. That’s exactly what’s happening here and it reflects the extent to which Apple’s unyielding campaign against Microsoft has rattled Redmond and caused them to respond. This campaign is well-executed, but fundamentally misguided. It adds credibility to Apple’s message by acknowledging it and will likely get some people wondering if there’s something to those Macs after all.
The campaign is also misguided because it tries to solve a strategic problem with advertising. Windows Vista gave PC users something they were not asking for - a more elegant operating system that was less reliable than Windows XP. This in itself was a reaction to Apple. Microsoft should have ignored Apple and focused on a more elementary need of PC users - a faster, simpler and more flexible operating system which would be more reliable and adaptable than Windows XP. Had Microsoft turned in this direction, Apple would have been irrelevant as a competitor. They would have ceded the high end to Apple while digging a firmer foothold in the everyday world where 90% of computer usage happens.
As it is, Microsoft has given Apple a major strategic opportunity with the Vista debacle. And now Microsoft is wasting nearly $800 million dollars trying to fix the strategic problem with advertising. Add that to the $500 million already spent to advertise the Vista launch and you have enough money to accelerate the next generation operating system launch by several years. Microsoft should stop letting Apple and Steve Jobs push them off of their game and create a “Windows lite.” Then they can brag.
One last problem with the ads - and this is the only one that Crispin Porter is really responsible for - is that they lack permission to believe. Watch the Apple campaign and you’ll see that each ad gives specific reasons that Apple is better than PC. There are no specifics in this Microsoft campaign.
Branding Bottom Line:
There’s a reason that P&G greats like Dawn and Tide never mention competitors. See you at the debates, PC bitches.

September 28th, 2008 at 10:02 am
I am a big fan of the Apple ads, and agree that the recent Sienfled ads were a misguided disaster likely due to ego-maniacs at Crispin, Porter Bogusky who want to believe they are ‘creative’ but couldn’t write a sreenplay that anyone would buy, so they went in to writing ads. As for the follow up campaign, I think it is refreshingly better and frankly about time that Microsoft showed the multi-dimensional lives of PC users.
October 1st, 2008 at 6:41 am
I like your angle on this, especially “solving a strategic problem with advertising” which seems to be a client’s (most company’s) typical response. And they call themselves business people.
P.S. Dove is a Unilever brand.
October 1st, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Very interesting article, I never actually broke it down like that, but reading the article and thinking back to the commercials it makes sense.
October 2nd, 2008 at 8:21 am
I hadn’t thought of the approach of misusing advertising to solve a strategic problem. I certainly agree that what many users wanted out of new Windows is the same thing they’ve wanted out of windows since windows 95. Stability, reliability, and performance. Instead every now and then we get things like windowsMe and windows Vista.
October 3rd, 2008 at 9:14 am
I was at a conference where I heard the “ad wizards” discuss how the campaign came to be. I agree with you - I’m not sure you can solve this with advertising. Having worked with and @ MS in Marketing, I think CP+B are fighting an uphill battle.
October 12th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
fyi, Microsoft’s “I’m a PC” campaign extends to the online world as well. Here’s the first of what should be multiple executions:
http://adverlicio.us/microsoft_im_pc_160×600
November 18th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Interesting article post.
No matter what type of advertising medium businesses choose to use, it’s important that the message(s) represented in the ad are clear. Although the MS ads are clear, I do agree they lack specific examples as to why MS is better than other operating systems.
It’s the same rule I’ve heard from my college professors time and time again, you have to support your argument.