<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SUPER BOWL XL FIRST LOOK &#8211; Hits and Misses of the Big Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thirdwayblog.com/post-types/super-bowl-xl/super-bowl-xl-first-look.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/ameriquest/super-bowl-xl-first-look.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/ameriquest/super-bowl-xl-first-look.html#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thirdwayblog.com/blog/?p=126#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  Read my comments on it at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.selfishgiving.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.selfishgiving.com&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  Read my comments on it at <a href="http://www.selfishgiving.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.selfishgiving.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vinjamuri</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/ameriquest/super-bowl-xl-first-look.html#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vinjamuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thirdwayblog.com/blog/?p=126#comment-734</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree that Norelco has the edge (so to speak) and might gain some ground against Gillette as they try to up-price their franchise.Gillette seems so caught up with the technology and the masculine angle that they are drifting away from the consumer end benefit.  Is irritation really a big enough justification to launch a five-bladed razor?Marketers assume that if they&#039;ve done something successfully five times, the sixth will be easy.  But many systems have a breaking point - a discrete point at which everything changes all at once.  The question is whether we&#039;re getting there with razor blade pricing and whether Norelco can capitalize on this.Either way, the Norelco spot was brilliant.  Thanks for the U.K. link. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree that Norelco has the edge (so to speak) and might gain some ground against Gillette as they try to up-price their franchise.Gillette seems so caught up with the technology and the masculine angle that they are drifting away from the consumer end benefit.  Is irritation really a big enough justification to launch a five-bladed razor?Marketers assume that if they&#039;ve done something successfully five times, the sixth will be easy.  But many systems have a breaking point &#8211; a discrete point at which everything changes all at once.  The question is whether we&#039;re getting there with razor blade pricing and whether Norelco can capitalize on this.Either way, the Norelco spot was brilliant.  Thanks for the U.K. link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thirdwayblog.com/ameriquest/super-bowl-xl-first-look.html#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 10:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thirdwayblog.com/blog/?p=126#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Dear David,I read your posts on the Norelco ad with the 15 blades a few months ago. Now that I see this Fusion ad I cannot help but wonder if Gillette is being &#039;out-Gilletted&#039; by Norelco. In the UK the spoof went even further: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quintippio.co.ukwww.quintippio.co.uk&lt;br&lt;/a&gt; /&gt;To me the Gillette ads are always so stereotypical, leaving me feel misunderstood as a person. Norelco are a lot more focussed on the person using the product. Norelco are talking about the benfits of a better skin rather than a feature extra blade. After all an edditional balde isn&#039;t adding any value, I want a result.What do you think? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear David,I read your posts on the Norelco ad with the 15 blades a few months ago. Now that I see this Fusion ad I cannot help but wonder if Gillette is being &#039;out-Gilletted&#039; by Norelco. In the UK the spoof went even further: &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://www.quintippio.co.ukwww.quintippio.co.uk&lt;br" rel="nofollow">http://www.quintippio.co.ukwww.quintippio.co.uk&lt;br</a> /&gt;To me the Gillette ads are always so stereotypical, leaving me feel misunderstood as a person. Norelco are a lot more focussed on the person using the product. Norelco are talking about the benfits of a better skin rather than a feature extra blade. After all an edditional balde isn&#039;t adding any value, I want a result.What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

